|
(This Advisory Opinion expressly repeals Advisory Opinion No. 75-009 rendered by the Ohio Ethics Commission on June 10, 1975) Syllabus by the Ohio Ethics Commission:
* * * * * * Your request for an advisory opinion asks whether a member of the Warder Public Library District Board of Clark County is prohibited by Section 102-04 (B) of the Revised Code from receiving compensation for services personally rendered on behalf of clients before the county commissioners of Clark County. You state, by way of history, that you are a member of the Warder Public Library District Board, appointed to that position by the county commissioners, that you are also a practicing attorney and that your practice involves representation of clients' interests before the county commissioners. Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code states:
The issue is whether you, as a member of the Warder Public Library District for purposes of Section Board have been "appointed to an office of 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory Opinion No. 74-007 established the following tests for determining whether a person is appointed to an "office": (1) was he appointed; (2) does he have a title; (3) does he exercise functions of government concerning the public; and (4) is he not subject to a contract of employment. In Advisory Opinion No. 75-004, the Ohio Ethics Commission added a further test -- the exercise of sovereign power. Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory opinion No. 75-007 applies these five tests to the offices which fall within the purview of Division (B) of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code. It is, therefore, necessary to examine legislation establishing Library District Boards in order to determine whether persons appointed to district library boards are "persons appointed to an office" for purposes of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. By virtue of Section 3375.22 of the Revised Code, county commissioners may establish Library District Boards:
Therefore, members of Library District Boards, appointed pursuant to Section 3375.22 of the Revised Code, exercise functions of government concerning the public, do not have a contract of employment and have the title of library trustees. They, therefore, would be appointed to an "office" for purposes of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code if they also meet the sovereign power test. The statutorily imposed duties of Library District Boards obviates the question. The library trustees exercise administrative discretion and have authority in excess of the mere formulation of plans or making recommendations. Section 3375.40 of the Revised Code lists the following duties of the library trustees:
Those duties and responsibilities emphasized in the above quoted section indicate that the duties of members of the Library District Board involve the exercise of sovereign power. Thus, it can be said that they are appointed to "an office" for purposes of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. Since the ultimate question is whether a member of a library district board can represent clients before the county commissioners, the next issue becomes whether a library district is a department or agency of the county. Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 1970, issued in 1950, held that a county library district is an entity separate and distinct from the county itself. The Court, in 60 Ohio L. Abs. 364, 369, (1951), stated that library boards are "separate and distinct entities or bodies politic and corporate, separate and apart from the municipality, the county, the school board, etc. and not agents of said bodies politic." Thus, a library district is not a subdivision of the county or a subordinate department of the county and a member of the library district board is not prohibited by Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code from representing a client before the county commissioners. The final issue is whether a County Library District Board is "any other governmental entity" as that term is used in Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. In Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory Opinion No. 75-021, the Commission stated that "it seems apparent that the State Legislature intended for political subdivisions to come under that section (Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code) and that the phrase 'any other governmental entity' should include political subdivisions other than counties, townships, or municipal corporations. Section 3375.33 of the Revised Code states that:
In construing this section and other sections of the Revised Code pertaining to county library district boards, the Ohio Attorney General concluded that such district boards are "political subdivisions." In the opinion, 1953 Ohio Attorney General 2994, the Attorney General held that the County Library District of Hamilton County was a political subdivision and automobiles owned by it were exempt from the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act which exempted any motor vehicle owned by "the United States, this state, or any political subdivision of this state. . ." A person who is appointed to a county library district board is a "person who is . . . appointed to an office of . . . a . . . governmental entity" for purposes of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. As such, a member of that board is only prohibited from receiving or agreeing to receive, directly or indirectly, compensation, other than from the library district board, for any service rendered or to be rendered by him personally in any case, proceeding, application or other matter which is before any agency of the library district. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Ohio Ethics Commission and you are so advised that a County Library District is a political subdivision; and, that a member of a County Public Library District Board is not prohibited by section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code from receiving or agreeing to receive, directly or indirectly, compensation other than from the agency with which he serves, for any service rendered or to be rendered by him personally in any case, proceeding, application or other matter which is before any agency, department, board, bureau, commission or other instrumentality of the county in which the library district is located. OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION |
|||||
|
by the Ohio Ethics Commission, of the search engine or its products or services. |
|||||
|
|